LukeMarshall.net
← All posts

AI versus Marshy - The Impact of AI on Freelancing Jobs

Welcome to this standalone article about AI and its impact on freelancing jobs. I’m Marshy, a growth marketer with a conscience, and I’m excited to share some insights from the latest edition of my newsletter, ‘AI versus Marshy’. In this article, I’ll be discussing the impact of AI on freelancing jobs, as well as some other interesting topics from the world of AI. Let’s dive in! Hello and welcome to the 36th edition of AI versus Marshy! The distillation of a week’s worth of AI news by a growth marketer with a conscience. Lots to talk about this week, including: A deeper look at context windows and why they’re important Some hard data on the impact of AI on freelancing jobs I rub shoulders with the HR crowd investigating AI and startup potential So let’s make like a slope and ski on with it ⛷️ -Marshy TIL about context windows Via Every . First Google called it Bard. Then they rebadged it to Gemini. They released a Pro version. But this update is about Gemini Pro 1.5. Hopefully I didn’t confuse you! Dan Shipper - founder of Every and it’s respective publication Chain of Thought , had a chance to play with the latter. We all know that Google have been working on AI for a long-time. We could also claim that ChatGPT caught them with their pants down (rude!). But it’s not like one of the world’s most valuable companies was sitting on their hands. Gemini Pro 1.5 is proof of that. Dan’s article goes into the nuts and bolts of why, but the headline is: context windows . A way to think about this is how near/far the LLM can zoom into a topic. The example Dan gives is about an obscure book he references about a particular scene. Um, no This is wrong, and because ChatGPT can’t retrieve that level of detail in one fell swoop (it moves in chunks ) it guesses what the most likely answer is. The example is helpful because it gives you a sense of how the tech works. If he gives it the whole book - ChatGPT can answer it, but not because it can read the whole book, but because it can look for “first answers after an event” and then provide the best possible answer for that. Dan balances this against GP 1.5 - which absolutely nails it with succinct detail. I’ve noticed this while building my GPT by just uploading my book and some steering. The tool doesn’t quite nail it - and I had to add some strict guardrails to stick to the principles. The reason for this is context windows. You can’t get an AI to operate as a detailed book is instructing to - yet . But with GP 1.5 it appears you can. The plot thickens. Draw me a gemini swallowing a chatgpt If this trend continues - a large context window has the room to absorb all of your personal data to have at the tip of your fingers ready to go. This is utopia for academic researchers, and basically the same for me (I have books, book highlights, saved articles, articles, 1,000+ notes on various subjects and projects etc.) Look out! Keep in mind - we’re only into Year 2 since LLMs went big-time (yes, you read that correctly). The impact of AI on freelancing jobs Via Bloomberry . Henley wrote an amazing piece looking at the data/changes in job ads on Upwork since 1st November 2022. That’s when ChatGPT broke out and you would think with a 16 month data set you would see some obvious change? Yes, and no. Henley looked at: jobs with biggest decrease in volume jobs least affected jobs with biggest decrease in pay which AI skills had the biggest increase in job postings Here’s the summary: Most jobs increased Writing, translation, and customer service jobs are in decline Video editing, graphic design, and web design increased the most The biggest decreases in pay were across translation, video editing/production, and web design The weirdest part of it all was the biggest increase in job postings? Chatbots! Really? This is the best we can do? Bizarre. Can we not think of anything else for remote freelancers to do? I didn’t realise you could get so much data from Upwork. Matt @ Systm (growth marketer) shares another use case for validating your B2B software idea . Marshy’s look at generative AI and Human Resources. Via Gartner . 76% of HR leaders believe they need to implement AI solutions within the next 12-24 months or be lagging I’ve been hinting at working on something for a while and I’m still not ready to go prime-time as details get ironed out. I can say I’ve been immersing myself in the world of HR and looking at what AI can do for this sector. While I’m a career-trained digital marketer, it’s not because it’s the most exciting discipline. At the time - I saw it as the discipline I could leverage the most. I had a natural affinity for online and communication, so when Twitter, 3G mobile, and Google started taking off I was ready to ride the wave. Originally appeared in newsletter : AI versus Marshy #36: context windows, job updates, and HR

Want more of this?

Weekly-ish thoughts on AI, growth, and being human in tech. Sometimes useful, sometimes not.

Subscribe to AI versus Marshy →